| Conservation Commission Minutes 10/6/09 |
| Written by Lisa Fellows-Weaver | |
| Wednesday, 16 December 2009 | |
|
Conservation Commission Minutes October 6, 2009 Official as of November 3, 2009 Chairman Steve Roy calls the meeting to order at 7:09 p.m. Present: Chairman Steve Roy, Vice Chairman Steve Hampl, Paul Lussier, Loren O’Neil, Board Administrator Linda Smith, and Board Secretary Lisa Fellows-Weaver. Mike Matson arrives at 7:45 p.m. Absent: Wini Young, and Jim Ryan Minutes Public Input Mr. Roy explains that the town cannot apply town funds to private roads. He explains that he lives on a private road and their culverts needed to be replaced. Everyone on the road contributed to repairing the culverts and it was a collaborative agreement as all residents on the road own a portion of the road. He adds that a wetlands permit was not required for his project. He asks who owns this road and Mr. Naleid replies the owners of the road live in New Jersey and he has not been able to reach them. Additional discussion is held regarding rights of way and deeded rights. Mr. Naleid states that he is not sure as to deed languages of the other residents who use this private road. He adds that the concern is that there is a population of 30 houses on this road with a lot of traffic. He explains that there is a continuous stream, approximately 4 ft. wide that flows under the private road. He asks if there is any direction that the commission can give or if there is anyone that may have an interest in the condition of the culvert. Mr. Roy states that the water quality of the lake is a concern and he recommends that the deed language be researched for rights and abilities to maintain the road. He suggests contacting the lake association as well as contacting the state relative to the wetlands. He adds that the replacement of the culvert will require a wetlands permit. Mr. Roy adds that there may be a possible violation of the road itself and he suggests that Mr. Naleid contact NHDES, explain the drainage issues, and provide the name of the owners. Appointments Mr. Rhodes explains that the project is to construct athletic fields on a 24.5 acre parcel. He explains that the access to the new fields requires a driveway, crossing jurisdictional wetlands to access the rear 20 acres. He states that the wetlands area impacted by this driveway will be 2,350 sq. ft. Mr. Rhodes states that there are two fields in the front of the property and this crossing will be at the narrowest point with no additional work beyond the crossing. He adds that they propose a gravel parking area. He notes that an alteration of terrain permit will be filed as well. Mr. Roy states that members have walked this parcel and there was a good view of the general wet area. Mr. Roy asks if the access road will be paved and Mr. Rhodes replies that it will be gravel. A discussion is held regarding setbacks relative to the parking area and driveway. Mr. Roy states that the driveway is not exempt from setbacks and must meet 20’. Mr. Rhodes replies that they have met all setbacks. Mike Matson arrives at 7:45. The application and checklist are reviewed. A discussion is held regarding the need for a wetlands scientist stamp being required. Mr. Rhodes states that this stamp is not required. In addition, Mr. Roy notes that the distances from the wetlands impact to the abutters has not been delineated. Mr. Roy asks if there will be blasting involved and Mr. Rhodes replies yes. Mr. Roy notes that there is a community water supply well for the condos. Mr. Rhodes states that he is unsure as to the location of this well. Mr. Roy states that there is significant potential to impact ground water with blasting operations and modern blasting materials. He states that the process for the alteration of terrain permit has been revised to include water quality related issues due to the proximity of the community water supply well. He adds that there will be costs associated with this as well. Mr. Roy states that there will probably be a pre-blast survey including water quality prior to blasting as well as during and post the project. Mr. Roy asks about the detention basin and if it is just sheet flow from the gravel parking area. Mr. Rhodes explains that they are constructing swales on both sides with two culvert pipes to get the water into the detention pond. He adds that there will be no direct runoff from the parking area. Ms. O’Neil makes a motion to accept the application and for Chairman Roy to sign the plans after the distance is added from the abutters to the impact to the plans. Mr. Hampl seconds and amends the motion to require proper documentation regarding the certified wetlands scientist. Mr. Rhodes amends the plans and resubmits with the impacts delineated on the plans as well as the number for the certified wetlands scientist. Carl Wallman - Northwood Area Land Management Collaborative (NALMC) Mr. Roy mentions a steering committee and states that the steering committee will facilitate launching the friends group. Mr. Roy mentions the stewardship of the Northwood Meadows State Park and explains that the state does not have any funds available so the friends group will be created for the future protection, maintenance, and management of the park. Further discussion is held regarding the friends group progress. Additional discussion is held regarding the parcel and forest land management. Mr. Wallman provides a map of the area noting the forest areas and feels that this is the way of the future. He states that this land could become a forestry plan and would be unique in NH; however, this would only be with consenting property management. He adds that this group is only for purpose of exchanging ideas and would be available for people who want to be a part of it. Mr. Wallman adds that these activities are consensual. Mr. Wallman states that there is currently a DRED project going on at Forest Peters property. He explains that they are doing some studies and patch cutting. The intent to cut is reviewed. Mr. Matson makes a motion, second by Mr. Lussier, to appoint Mr. Roy as the conservation commission’s representative on the steering committee for NALMC. Motion passes; 4/0/1. Mr. Roy abstains. A discussion is held regarding distributing the ecological assessment report. Mr. Roy suggests that an article be placed in the Suncook Valley Sun as well as the commission having a display table at town meeting. The commission agrees to provide copies of the ecological assessment report at town meeting. Further discussion ensues regarding proposing a warrant article to designate the report and possibly editing the existing overlay district in town. Mr. Roy states that the steering committee would be discussing these issues and would possibly recommend items to the commission. Forester Contract Mr. Roy refers to Article 5 in the contract and requests that Ms. Smith further review this section with the town administrator as he does not feel this section should be addressed by the commission. Mr. Roy asks that the original proposal be compared to this contract. Ms. Smith reviews the information and states that all language is consistent with the contract and proposal. Mr. Roy makes a motion, second by Mr. Hampl, to finalize the contract with the amendments as discussed, provided that the town review #5 relative to the loss management language. Motion passes; 5/0. Mr. Roy motions to direct Ms. Smith to negotiate with Bean Hill Forest Services regarding the request for up to two annual meetings. Mr. Matson seconds. Motion passes; 5/0. Financial Report Additional discussion is held regarding the special day line. Mr. Roy explains that there is talk for the Discovery Day to occur again next year. He feels that this line should be increased to $400. Ms. Weaver reminds the commission of Ms. Young’s notation for the marker at Kelsey Mill. Ms. Smith notes that estimates for the marker were from $250. and up not including installation. Printing and education line is discussed and Mr. Roy proposes to level fund this line at $500. and cover the marker through this line. Installation is mentioned and to be funded under contracted services. As far as the town forest land management line, Mr. Roy proposes level funding this line and to keep in mind that the commission may need to cover some costs for town forester services. Additional discussions are held regarding the equipment line and the possible purchase of a GPS unit to use with topography and software with maps for trails. Mr. Matson notes that the state uses Maptech and he feels it is great software as well as the Garman brand for the unit itself. Ms. Smith suggests that the equipment line remain at $600. based on the need for staff for computer materials, licensing, etc. Mr. Roy motions to purchase a GPS unit up to $500. from Galls and for Mr. Hampl to review information and execute the purchase. Mr. Hampl seconds. Motion passes unanimously; 5/0. Loren O’Neil left at 9:45 p.m. A brief discussion is held regarding training. Mr. Roy notes that there are trainings available and he encourages members to attend. He proposes level funding this line. Mr. Roy makes a motion to spend $100. from this year’s budget from the maps line, 621, for software for maps for the GPS unit and for Mr. Hampl to execute this purchase through Linda Smith. Mr. Lussier seconds. Motion passes unanimously; 4/0. Mr. Matson makes a motion, second by Mr. Roy, to spend $100. from this year’s budget from the equipment line, 690, for software for the GPS unit and for Mr. Hampl to execute this purchase through Linda Smith. Motion passes unanimously; 4/0. Mr. Matson amends the motion to state that should the GPS unit be less than $500., he recommends that any additional funds be applied to software for maps and software for the GPS unit, purchasing executed by Mr. Hampl, through Linda Smith. Mr. Lussier seconds. Motion passes unanimously; 4/0. Mr. Roy makes a motions, second Mr. Lussier, to omit line 623-NCRC, from the budget format. Motion passes unanimously; 4/0. Mr. Roy makes a motion, second by Mr. Matson, to approve the revised budget as follows: TOTAL 46111 CONSERVATION $2,878.00 $3,227.00 TOTAL Correspondence All other correspondence is reviewed. Letter from Facilities Committee Other Adjournment Respectfully submitted, |